What exclusive actions has Trump taken? Media playback is unsupported on your device Media caption What just ...
What exclusive actions has Trump taken?
Media playback is unsupported on your device
One of the trustworthy ways a new president is able to spend political power is through unilateral executive orders.
While legislative exertions take time, a swipe of the pen from the White House can often conclude broad changes in government policy and practice.
President Donald Trump has wasted minor time in taking advantage of this privilege.
Given his predecessor's reliance on exclusive orders to circumvent Congress in the later days of his presidency, he has a great range of areas in which to flex his muscle.
What are exclusive orders?
Here's a look at some of what Mr Trump has done so far:
Climate mopish policy reversal
Mr Trump signed the elegant at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) undoing a key part of the Obama administration's exertions to tackle global warming.
The order reverses the Pure Power Plan, which had required states to regulate grand plants, but had been on hold at what time being challenged in court.
Before signing the elegant, a White House official told the dead that Mr Trump does believe in human-caused atmosphere change, but that the order was primary to ensure American energy independence and jobs.
Environmental groups warn that undoing those rules will have serious consequences at home and abroad.
"I think it is a atmosphere destruction plan in place of a atmosphere action plan," the Natural Resources Defense Council's David Doniger told the BBC, adding that they will fights the president in court.
Immediate impact: A coalition of 17 messes filed a legal challenge against the Trump administration's exclusive to roll back climate change regulations. The challenge, led by New York position, argued that the administration has a honest obligation to regulate emissions of the gases believed to goes global climate change. Mars Inc, Staples and The Gap are plus US corporations who are also challenging Mr Trump's reversal on atmosphere change policy.
Travel ban 2.0
After an angry weekend in Florida in which he accused former-president Barack Obama of wiretapping his phones at Trump Tower, Mr Trump returned to the White House to sign a revised version of his controversial proceed ban.
The executive order titled "protecting the fuel from foreign terrorist entry into the Joined States" was signed out of the view of the White House monotonous corps on 6 March.
The order's new calls is intended to skirt the legal pitfalls that commanded his first travel ban to be halted by the risk system.
The updated ban:
- Temporarily halts entry to citizens for 90-days of six Muslim-majority utters (Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen)
- Removes Iraq from the survive list, due to increased vetting of its own citizens
- Delays implementation pending 16 March
- Allows current visa holders to proceed to the US
- Does not capture permanent visa holders (Green Card holders)
- Suspends the refugee programme for 120 days
- Treats Syrians like any spanking refugee or immigrant
- Removes the religious phrase favouring religious minorities - namely Christians
Immediate impact: Soon while the order was signed, it was once anti blocked by a federal judge, this time in Hawaii.
Trump signs new travel-ban directive
Undoing Obama-era waterway regulations
Surrounded by farmers and Democrat lawmakers, Mr Trump signed an order on 28 February managing the EPA and the Army Corp of Wangles to reconsider a rule issued by President Obama.
The 2015 control - known as the Waters of the Joined States rule - gave authority to the federal government over slight waterways, including wetlands, headwaters and small ponds.
The rule obliged Clean Water Act permits for any buyer that wished to alter or damage these relatively slight water resources, which the president described as "puddles" in his signaling remarks.
Opponents of Mr Obama's rule, incorporating industry leaders, condemned it as a bulky power grab by Washington.
Scott Pruitt, Mr Trump's pick to lead the EPA, will now create the task of rewriting the rule, and a new recruit is not expected for several years.
Immediate impact: The EPA has been requisitioned to rewrite, or even repeal the rule, but first-rate it must be reviewed. Water protection laws were ratified by Congress long before Mr Obama's rule was announced, so it cannot plainly be undone with the stroke of a pen. Instead the EPA must re-evaluate how to account for the 1972 Clean Water Act.
Coal waste
A bill the dignified signed on 16 February put an end to an Obama-era control that aimed at protecting waterways from coal excavating waste.
Senator Mitch McConnell had called the rule an "attack on coal miners".
The US Center Department, which reportedly spent years drawing up the control before it was issued in December, had said it would defending 6,000 miles of streams and 52,000 expanses of forests.
Business regulations
An try to cut down on the burden of slight businesses.
Described as a "two-out, one-in" reach, the order asked government departments that examine a new regulation to specify two spanking regulations they will drop.
The Office of Board and Budget (OMB) will manage the controls and is expected to be led by the Democrat Mick Mulvaney.
Some categories of regulation will be excuse from the "two-out, one-in" clause - such as those trading with the military and national security and "any spanking category of regulations exempted by the Director".
Immediate impact: Wait and see.
Trump repositions to cut business regulation
Travel ban (first version)
Probably his most controversial frfragment, so far, taken to keep the land safe from terrorists, the president said.
It included:
- suspension of refugee programme for 120 days, and cap on 2017 numbers
- indefinite ban on Syrian refugees
- ban on anyone succeeding from seven Muslim-majority countries, with certain exceptions
- cap of 50,000 refugees
The achieve was felt at airports in the US and near the world as people were stopped embarking US-bound flights or held when they acquired in the US.
Immediate impact: Enacted radiant much straight away. But there are struggles ahead. Federal judges brought a halt to deportations, and suitable rulings appear to have put an end to the proceed ban - much to the president's displeasure.
Trump touch policy: Who's affected?
Border security
On Mr Trump's first-rate day as a presidential candidate in June 2015, he made guaranteeing the border with Mexico a priority.
He pledged repeatedly at recovers to "build the wall" along the southern touch, saying it would be "big, beautiful, and powerful".
Now he has signaled a pair of executive orders designed to complete that campaign promise.
One order declares that the US will gain "a contiguous, physical wall or other alike secure, contiguous, and impassable physical barrier".
The binary order pledges to hire 10,000 more immigration officers, and to revoke federal give money from so-called "sanctuary cities" which decline to deport undocumented immigrants.
It remains to be seen how Mr Trump will pay for the wall, although he has repeatedly persisted that it will be fully paid for by the Mexican government, despite their heads saying otherwise.
Immediate impact: The Region of Homeland Security has a "small" amount of wealth available (about $100m) to use immediately, but that won't get them very far. Interpretation of the wall will cost billions of bucks - money that Congress will need to approve. Senator Adulthood Leader Mitch McConnell has said the Republican-led Council will need to come up with $12-$15bn more, and the give fight - and any construction - will come up anti issues with harsh terrain, private land owners and opponent from both Democrats and some Republicans.
The regions will also need additional funds from Council to hire more immigration officers, but the shipshape will direct the head of the organization to start changing deportation priorities. Cities pursued by the threat to remove federal gives will likely build legal challenges, but exclusive of a court injunction, the money can be removed.
The Center for Natal Diversity, an environmental group, along with Arizona Democrat Raul Graijalva, have recorded a lawsuit against the Trump administration.
They argues the Department of Homeland Security is obliged to draft a new environmental review of the crashes of the wall and other border enforcement pursuits as it could damage public lands.
How just will Trump 'build the wall'?
Two arranges, two pipelines
On his transfer full working day, the president signed two arranges to advance construction of two controversial pipelines - the Keystone XL and Dakota Access.
Mr Trump told journalists the terms of both deals would be renegotiated, and comical American steel was a requirement.
Keystone, a 1,179-mile (1,897km) pipeline operating from Canada to US refineries in the Gulf Coast, was halted by President Barack Obama in 2015 due to worries over the message it would send in climate change.
The second pipeline was halted last year as the Army explored at other routes, amid huge protests by the Placing Rock Sioux Tribe at a North Dakota site.
Immediate impact: Mr Trump has gave a permit to TransCanada, the Keystone XL builder, to move ahead with the controversial pipeline. As a death, TransCanada will drop an arbitration claim for $15bn in costs it filed under the North American Free Deal Agreement. Mr Trump made no mention of an American steel requirement. Interpretation will not start until the company maintains a permit from Nebraska's Public Service Commission.
The Dakota Retrieve pipeline has since been filled with oil and the custom is in the process of preparing to leave moving oil.
Keystone XL pipeline: Why is it so disputed?
Dakota Pipeline: What's late the controversy?
Instructing federal organizations to weaken Obamacare
In one of his ample actions as president, Mr Trump issued a multi-paragraph directive to the Region of Health and Human Services and anunexperienced federal agencies involved in managing the people's healthcare system.
The order states that organizations must "waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay" any divides of the Affordable Care Act that establishes financial burden on states, individuals or healthcare providers.
Although the desirable technically does not authorise any powers the manager agencies do not already have, it's examined as a clear signal that the Trump dispensation will be rolling back Obama-era healthcare rules wherever possible.
Immediate impact: Republicans dedicated to secure an overhaul of the US healthcare rules due to a lack of support for the legislation. That benefitting Mr Trump's executive order is one of the only continue efforts to undermine Obamacare.
Can Obamacare be repealed?
Re-instating a ban on international abortion counselling
What's named the Mexico City policy, first implemented in 1984 Idea Republican President Ronald Reagan, prevents foreign non-governmental organisations that claim any US cash from "providing counselling or referrals for abortion or advocating for access to abortion services in their country", even if they do so with novel funding.
The ban, derided as a "global gag rule" by its magistrates, has been the subject of a political tug-of-war ever precise its inception, with every Democratic president rescinding the measure, and every Pro-republic bringing it back.
Anti-abortion activists imagined Mr Trump to act quickly on this - and he didn't nosedived them.
Immediate impact: The policy will come into caused as soon as the Secretaries of Conditions and Heath write an implementation plan and apply to both renewals and new grants. The US Conditions Department has notified the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that US grant for United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) would be withdrawn, arguing that it supports coercive abortion or involuntary sterilisation. The activity has denied this, pointing to examples of its life-saving work in more than 150 conditions and territories.
This policy will be much broader than the last time the rule was in establish - the Guttmacher Institute, Kaiser Family Complex and Population Action International believe the trim, as written, will apply to all global health grant by the US, instead of only reproductive health or family planning.
Trump's trim on abortion policy: What does it mean?
Withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, once watched as the crown jewel of Barack Obama's international contracts policy, was a regular punching bag for Mr Trump on the movement trail (although he at times seemed perilous about what nations were actually involved).
The deal was never well-liked by Congress so it had yet to go into enact in the US.
Therefore the formal "withdrawal" is more akin to a decision-making on the part of the US to end ongoing international negotiations and let the deal wither and die.
Immediate impact: Takes enact immediately. In the meantime, some experts are unnerved China will seek to replace itself in the deal or add TPP controls to its own free trade negotiations, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), excluding the US.
TPP: What is it and why does it matter?
The World News Reference
SRC: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38695593
COMMENTS